Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)

Union Of India vs The Delhi Wakf Board & Anr. on 18 August, 2010

In the case of Panchayat Deh (supra) the Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court had held that entries in the jamabandi carry a presumption of their correctness. In this case the record shows that the revenue record between the period 1905 to 1961 had conclusively RSA No.208/1981 Page 8 of 13 shown the ownership of the suit property in the name of the plaintiff. Even otherwise the onus to discharge this issue was on the defendant but the defendant had not produced any witness in defence.
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - I Kaur - Full Document

Punjab Wakf Board vs Gram Panchayat on 27 October, 1999

9. The reliance was placed by the plaintiff Board on the documentary evidence which I will presently discuss but before I discuss the evidence which has been relied upon by the plaintiff, it will be useful for me to quote the observations of two judgments reported as (1969)71 P.L.R. 1081, Panchayat Deh v. Punjab Wakf Board, Ambala, in which it was held that if a land has been 'recorded in the Jamabandi as Gair-mumkin Kabristan in occupation of Ahl-e-Islam but the village is pre-dominatly consisting of Hindus and only few Muslims who were there leaving for Pakistan and that there is no tomb or graveyard in existence and that the land has been occupied by the persons and has been built, such land will be deemed to be shamilat one being the ownership of the panchayat and the entry in the jamabandi will not be considered as correct. It was further observed by the High Court that dedication of Islam by long user cannot be presumed.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R L Anand - Full Document
1