Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)

Santanu Basu & Anr vs Smt. Aparna Basu & Ors on 17 August, 2022

Profit was further sought to be obtained making reliance on a decision by Mr. Chakraborty, reported in 2000 CalLT 254 delivered in the case of Harendr Nath Ghosh vs. Subodh Kumar Ghosh that petitioners without having taken consent of the opposite parties, who are co-sharer could not be permitted to raise any construction over any 6 portion of the subject property under reference, simply to hinder any effective partition or to diminish the value of the joint property.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Dasgupta - Full Document

(Arpita Nath & Ors vs Dr. Subodh Kumar ) on 1 April, 2022

rrc CPAN 565 of 2021 in WP 15526 (W) of 2019 (Arpita Nath & Ors. Vs. Dr. Subodh Kumar ) Mr. Amit Kumar Pan Ms. Tanusri Santra ....For the petitioners Mr. Pan, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the order passed by this Court on 7th January, 2020 has already been complied with and the petitioner does not want to proceed with the contempt application. Let the written instruction, as produced, be kept on record. In view thereof, the present contempt application being CPAN 565 of 2021 is dismissed.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T Chakraborty - Full Document
1