Vitthaldas Tribhuvandas Bagadia And ... vs The State Of Mah And Ors on 20 December, 2017
85. SLAO has already taken possession of the land in question
from the petitioners and has already handed over possession of the land
to the acquiring body who turn has handed over possession to the
allottees. The acquiring body has also deposited the entire
compensation with the SLAO. The SLAO has already deposited
::: Uploaded on - 21/12/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2017 02:10:52 :::
ppn 57 wp-285.12(j).doc
compensation amount in Civil Court, Jalna in view of the petitioners
not collecting the said compensation inspite of the notice received from
the SLAO. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that
his client would be entitled to a fair compensation under Section 24 of
the LARR Act, 2013 has thus no merit. The principles of the law laid
down in the decision of the Division Bench of this Court at Aurangabad
bench in the case of City and Industrial Development Corporation Vs.
State of Maharashtra and others, delivered on 6th October 2017 in
Writ Petition No.6917 of 2004 and the decision of the Full Bench of this
Court in the case of Mehtab Laiq Ahmed Shaikh and Anr. Vs. State of
Maharashtra and Ors., delivered on 13th October 2017 in Writ Petition
No.2827 of 2014 and other connected matters would squarely apply to
the facts of this Court.