Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 159 (1.75 seconds)
Documents citing Ramji Prasad vs Rattan Kumar Jaiswal And Anr. on 18 April, 2000

Rajeshbhai Keshavbhai Parmar vs State Of Gujarat on 25 September, 2017

In   two   pronouncements,   namely  Ramji   Prasad   v.   Rattan   Kumar   Jaiswal   And   Another  and  Vijay   Kumar   v.   Narendra   And   Others     (supra),  the  Supreme Court has held that the normal practice  in cases such as murder is not to suspend the  sentence   and   it   is   only   in   exceptional   cases  that the benefit of suspension of sentence ought  to be granted. From the evidence on record, we  cannot   conclude   that   the   present   is   such   an  exceptional case where the power of suspension  of   sentence   is   required,   or   deserves,   to   be  Page 42 of 43 HC-NIC Page 42 of 43 Created On Mon Sep 25 23:16:51 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/14865/2017 JUDGMENT exercised in favour of the applicant.
Gujarat High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - A Kumari - Full Document

Vikrambhai @ Bhako Keshubhai ... vs State Of Gujarat on 3 October, 2017

In  Ramji   Prasad   v.   Rattan   Kumar   Jaiswal   And   Another  (supra), the Supreme Court has stated  that   the   normal   practice   in   a   case   under  Section 302 is not suspension of sentence. It  is only in exceptional cases that the benefit  of   suspension   of   sentence   can   be   granted.   In  the   present   case,   we   find   no   exceptional  circumstance   persuading   us   to   suspend   the  sentence imposed upon the applicants.
Gujarat High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - A Kumari - Full Document

Sripat Marandi vs State Of Jharkhand on 10 December, 2012

9. In Vijay Kumar v. Narendra and Ramji Prasad v.   Rattan Kumar Jaiswal it was held by this Court that   in cases involving conviction under Section 302 IPC,   it   is   only   in   exceptional   cases   that   the   benefit   of   suspension   of   sentence   can   be   granted.   The  impugned order of the High Court does not meet the requirement.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

Kalawati Devi vs State Of Jharkhand on 20 August, 2016

9.  In Vijay Kumar v. Narendra and Ramji Prasad   v. Rattan Kumar Jaiswal it was held by this Court   that in cases involving conviction under Section   302 IPC,  it is only in exceptional cases that the   benefit of suspension of sentence can be granted.   The impugned order of the High Court does not   meet the requirement.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

Kamakhya Narayan Giri vs The State Of Jharkhand on 19 December, 2012

9.  In Vijay Kumar v. Narendra and Ramji Prasad v.   Rattan Kumar Jaiswal it was held by this Court that   in cases involving conviction under Section 302 IPC,   it   is   only   in   exceptional   cases   that   the   benefit   of   suspension of sentence can be granted. The impugned  order   of   the   High   Court   does   not   meet   the   requirement.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

Kalachand Mahto & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand on 10 December, 2013

In Vijay Kumar v. Narendra and Ramji Prasad v.   Rattan Kumar Jaiswal it was held by this Court that   in cases involving conviction under Section 302 IPC, it   is   only   in   exceptional   cases   that   the   benefit   of  suspension of sentence can be granted. The impugned   order   of   the   High   Court   does   not   meet   the   requirement.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next