Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)
Documents citing Alok Lodhi And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 8 June, 2020

Sandeep Patel vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 April, 2023

3. It is contended by the counsel for the petitioners that a perusal of the First Information Report which has been brought on record as Annexure P/2 reflects that the petitioners have been falsely implicated on totally baseless and concocted allegations. A perusal of the proceedings before the Parivar Paramarsh Kendra reflects that lodging of First Information Report was merely an after thought and if the allegations in the First Information Report and the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. are taken into consideration, the same would reveal that omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioners and all the witnesses in cyclostyled form have given statements which reflect that the implication of the petitioners is baseless and accordingly, the entire proceedings deserve to be quashed. Counsel for the petitioners have placed reliance upon the decision of this Court in M.Cr.C. No.47904/2019 (Alok Lodhi & Ors vs. State of M.P. & Anr).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 4 - M S Bhatti - Full Document

Saryu Prasad Garg vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 March, 2024

3. It is contended by the counsel that lodging of FIR is a counter blast to the proceedings initiated by the husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act and till filing of application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, no report under Section 498A of IPC was lodged against the applicants. It is also contended by the counsel that the allegations levelled in the FIR reveal that general and omnibus allegations have been levelled and no specific act on the part of the each applicants has been detailed in the FIR, therefore, the proceedings initiated against the applicants deserve to be quashed. To support his contention, learned counsel for the applicants placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of Alok Lodhi & Ors. Vs. State of M.P. and Anr. in M.Cr.C. No.47904/2019, Tarun and Ors. Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. in M.Cr.C. No.8104/2017 and in the case of Nirbhay Singh Thakur Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh in M.Cr.C. No.24421/2023.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - M S Bhatti - Full Document

Yogesh Garg vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 March, 2024

3. It is contended by the counsel that lodging of FIR is a counter blast to the proceedings initiated by the husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act and till filing of application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, no report under Section 498A of IPC was lodged against the applicants. It is also contended by the counsel that the allegations levelled in the FIR reveal that general and omnibus allegations have been levelled and no specific act on the part of the each applicants has been detailed in the FIR, therefore, the proceedings initiated against the applicants deserve to be quashed. To support his contention, learned counsel for the applicants placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the case of Alok Lodhi & Ors. Vs. State of M.P. and Anr. in M.Cr.C. No.47904/2019, Tarun and Ors. Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. in M.Cr.C. No.8104/2017 and in the case of Nirbhay Singh Thakur Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh in M.Cr.C. No.24421/2023.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - M S Bhatti - Full Document
1