Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing M/S. Tola Ram & Sons & Anr. vs State Bank Of India And Anr. on 29 October, 2014

M/S Tola Ram & Sons vs State Bank Of India on 17 December, 2018

15.             In his cross­examination, he has deposed that his firm is registered with the  Registrar of Firm and he is one of the partner of the firm and the Form A was issued by  registrar which contain his name as one of the partners but it is not filed on court record.  He denied the suggestion that wrong pay in slip were filed alongwith the suit. He denied  the suggestion that he has got registered the FIR U/s 420 IPC only against the employee  of   Punjab   National   Bank   and   not   against   the   employee   of   State   Bank   of   India   and  volunteered that he only filed FIR only against the SBI. He do not know the report of CFSL  qua the pay slip. He do not know the name of the bank who cleared the cheque. He do not  CS No. 609968/16   Tola Ram & Sons Vs. State Bank of India Page No. 7 of 37 know whether it was SBI or PNB.
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Jainender Kumar Jain vs Sh. Hari Nath Rastogi (Since Deceased) on 12 September, 2018

(7)  Tola Ram & Sons & Anr. vs. State Bank of India & Anr.  215   (2014)   DLT   5   (DHC)   wherein   it   has   been   held   that unimpeachable documents can be allowed to be filed; counter foils of deposit slips of defendant/respondent No.1 bank are unimpeachable documents can be allowed to be filed and proved.  In the case in hand, no   useful   purpose   will   be   served   by   taking   the   passbook   and counterfoil of deposit slip on record, so ratio of this judgment is not applicable   and   the   application   U/o   XLI   Rule   27   CPC   has   been accordingly dismissed.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1