Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Rani And Another vs State on 12 October, 1995

State vs . Raj Rani & Others on 27 July, 2011

14. The arguments of Ld. Defence counsel regarding discharge of both the accused persons are not convincing for the reasons, firstly, there is sufficient incriminating evidence, as mentioned above against both the accused persons establishing grave suspicion that they might have committed alleged offences in furtherance of their common intention. Secondly, the principles of law laid down in cases Smt. Rani & Another vs. The State, supra, FIR No.379/07 State Vs. Raj Rani etc. Page 14 of 15 Sarbans Singh & Ors. vs. State of NCT of Delhi, supra, U.T. Chandigarh vs. Sunil Dutt, supra & Dharam Pal vs. State, are not attracted because the facts and evidence of the present case are distinguishable from the above mentioned cases.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1