Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 225 (1.71 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India Etc vs Parma Nand Etc on 14 March, 1989

Suryadeo Singh vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 14 May, 2010

29. It, however, would require an application of mind by the disciplinary authority in each case as to what was the charge in the criminal case and whether on account of bringing of such charge in the criminal case leading to conviction where the government servant has rendered himself unfit to continue in government service or become entitle to be given certain punishment lesser than removal or dismissal from service. This much has to be looked into by the disciplinary authority and was held in the case of Union of India vs. Parma Nanda, reported in AIR 1989 SUPREME COURT 1185 wherein the Apex Court has held as follows :-
Patna High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 1 - M K Jha - Full Document

State Bank Of Hyderabad, Gunfoundry, ... vs V.K. Gadgil on 28 April, 1994

18. The ratio laid down by the Supreme court in Union of India v. parma Nanda (supra) was applied by one of us (Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri) in M. Jagadeesh v. State Bank of Hyderabad, 1991 (1) AN. W. R. 225. In that case, it was found that there had been no violation of principles of natural justice and on the question of punishment, it was held that it was not within the province of this Court to go into the adequacy of the punishment for the proved misconduct awarded by the disciplinary authority.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 15 - Cited by 8 - S S Quadri - Full Document

Yogesh Tiwari vs Power on 1 November, 2025

13. It is noted that though the respondents have referred to the case of Parma Nand (supra), the facts of the said case is quite distinguishable with the facts in the instant case. In the said case, one subordinate authority had initiated disciplinary proceedings against the applicant and there was no question of loss of one forum for approaching on appeal, whereas in the instant case, the Appellate Authority has acted as the Disciplinary Authority and therefore, there was loss of one forum to appeal. As per the CCS Rules, in case of disagreement with the opinion of Disciplinary Authority while reviewing suo moto the case of the delinquent the disciplinary authority of the applicant cannot be the Lieutenant Governor as the applicant is a Group 'B' Officer (JE) and not even holding the post of Assistant Engineer on current duty charge (only looking after the duty of AE). Therefore, in our considered opinion, the contention of the applicant that in his case, Disciplinary Authority is the Chief Secretary and not the Lieutenant Governor is correct.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Central Administrative Tribunal vs The Union Of India on 29 June, 2012

.....The High Court/Tribunal, while exercising the power of judicial review, cannot normally substitute its own conclusion on penalty and impose some other penalty. If the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority or the appellate authority shocks the conscience of the High Court/Tribunal, it would appropriately mould the relief, either directing the disciplinary/appellate authority to reconsider the penalty imposed, or to shorten the litigation, it may itself, in exceptional and rare cases, impose appropriate punishment with cogent reasons in support thereof. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Parma Nanda with Parma Nanda Vs. State of Haryana and others reported in AIR 21 OA..641/2006 1989 SC 1185 has held as under:
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Masjood Ali vs General Manager N C Rly on 5 December, 2023

So the authorities have not conducted any inquiry and their action is against the rules and illegal and against the findings of the High Court. The applicant also says that the Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in Union of India vs. Parma Nanda will not be applicable in the present case because the disciplinary authority has not acted according to rules and laws and punishment is without departmental enquiry and awarded after receipt of the notice of voluntary retirement. Hence, it can be interfered by the court.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next