Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.54 seconds)

V.Suresh Kumar vs The District Registrar on 20 December, 2022

4.The respondents have filed counter affidavits. Their primary contention is that these writ petitions are not maintainable. They rely on the order dated 23.02.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A Nos.251, 253 and 254 of 2020 & O.S.A Nos.79 to 83 of 2020 (South Indian Artistes Association v. The Registrar of Societies) and the order dated 09.06.2022 in WP(MD)No.11290 of 2022 passed by me. The learned Senior Counsel for https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 8/28 the contesting private respondents placed heavy reliance on the recent decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in 2022 SCC OnLine 1091 (St.Mary's Education Society and another vs. Rajendra Prasad Bhargava and ors). He would argue that some of the members had already filed a civil suit challenging their expulsion. They withdrew the suit unconditionally. They had not obtained liberty. Having already availed the common law remedy and not pursued the same, it is not open to them to file the present writ petitions. His third contention is that the election process has already commenced and therefore, it would not be proper for this Court to interfere at this stage. He would also point out that the earlier order passed by this Court in respect of the very same society is subject matter of challenge in WA(MD)Nos.1013 and 1211 to 1219 of 2022. He pressed for dismissal of these writ petitions.

V.Suresh Kumar vs The District Registrar on 20 December, 2022

4.The respondents have filed counter affidavits. Their primary contention is that these writ petitions are not maintainable. They rely on the order dated 23.02.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A Nos.251, 253 and 254 of 2020 & O.S.A Nos.79 to 83 of 2020 (South Indian Artistes Association v. The Registrar of Societies) and the order dated 09.06.2022 in WP(MD)No.11290 of 2022 passed by me. The learned Senior Counsel for https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 8/28 the contesting private respondents placed heavy reliance on the recent decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in 2022 SCC OnLine 1091 (St.Mary's Education Society and another vs. Rajendra Prasad Bhargava and ors). He would argue that some of the members had already filed a civil suit challenging their expulsion. They withdrew the suit unconditionally. They had not obtained liberty. Having already availed the common law remedy and not pursued the same, it is not open to them to file the present writ petitions. His third contention is that the election process has already commenced and therefore, it would not be proper for this Court to interfere at this stage. He would also point out that the earlier order passed by this Court in respect of the very same society is subject matter of challenge in WA(MD)Nos.1013 and 1211 to 1219 of 2022. He pressed for dismissal of these writ petitions.
1