Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)

Arvind @ Lala vs State Of M.P. on 11 May, 2022

Similarly, in the matter of Asharam Tiwari vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, reported in (2021) 2 SCC 608, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that if PW1 and PW4 are both injured witnesses and they were found to be reliable and truthful, then there is no reason why they would falsely implicated another. The Hon'ble Apex Court has further held that failure to examine any available independent witness is inconsequential. It is quality of evidence and not number of witnesses that is relevant. Merely because witnesses being related to deceased, that by itself would not affect the credibility of testimony of such witnesses.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 2 - R K Shrivastava - Full Document

Ramlal Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 April, 2022

Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P (S) No.11795/2004 (Atmaram Tiwari Vs. State of M.P & others) and submits that under similar facts and circumstances a coordinate Bench of this Court directed the authorities of respondent no.1 and 3 therein to take action for granting appointment to the petitioner therein on the post of Driver in accordance with the noting made by the then Sub Divisional Officer within 2 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document
1