Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.87 seconds)

(6) After A Search Is Conducted Under Sub vs State Fo Delhi on 28 April, 2022

(ix) The manner of recovery is not confidently clearly and cogently set forth. This has been the overriding peculiar circumstance of this case that the black color polythene which was found containing 105 gms. of heroin is recovered from the left hand of the accused in the personal search of the accused and none of the recovery witnesses including the empowered officer had seen the accused carrying a black color polythene in her left hand, or hiding /concealing something in her left hand. It is discovered by W/Ct. Pooja for the first time when she was present with the accused inside the government vehicle that accused is carrying a black color polythene with some heavy substance inside in her left hand. Such unexplained circumstances therefore would warrant that the compliance of section 50 of the Act in accordance with the mandate of H'ble the Apex Court in Arif Khan, and compliance of section 50(4) as per the observation of H'ble the High Court of Delhi made in Mamta's case, was desirable.
Delhi District Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dinesh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 January, 2022

This repeat application has been filed on the ground of delay in trial. However, the order-sheets of the Trial Court have not been filed to show that the applicant is not responsible for the delay. Further, the prosecutrix has been examined and she has supported the prosecution case. The Supreme Court in case of Mamta Nair v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2021) 7 SCC 442, has held that examination of complainant cannot be a ground for bail as well as cannot be said to be a changed circumstance.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document
1   2 3 Next