Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (1.12 seconds)

M S Raju vs K Rambabu on 4 September, 2020

In furtherance of the submissions and contentions, he relied upon the decision of the High Court of Telangana reported in "Syed Hadi Ali Moosavi Vs. Syeda Taquia Moosavi and Others," 1 the decision of erstwhile High Court of A.P., reported in "K. Raghavendra Raju Vs. Syed Yousuf and Others"2, and the decision of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh reported in "Kavitha Balaji and others Vs. State of Telangana and Others"3.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - B K Mohan - Full Document

Pothula Venkata Raman Reddy, vs The Tahsildar on 25 November, 2024

9. The Judgment in Smt.Kavitha Balaji and Another vs. The State of Telangana5 cited by the counsel for the Petitioners was a case, where a suit, which was rejected before numbering, was entertained under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In the said Judgment, this Court entertained the Revision in exercise of its discretionary power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The said Judgement is not a precedent to say that the only remedy for the Petitioner, when the plaint is rejected before numbering, is to file a Revision either under Section 115 of CPC of under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pothula Venkata Raman Reddy vs The Tahsildar on 25 November, 2024

9. The Judgment in Smt.Kavitha Balaji and Another vs. The State of Telangana5 cited by the counsel for the Petitioners was a case, where a suit, which was rejected before numbering, was entertained under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In the said Judgment, this Court entertained the Revision in exercise of its discretionary power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The said Judgement is not a precedent to say that the only remedy for the Petitioner, when the plaint is rejected before numbering, is to file a Revision either under Section 115 of CPC of under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nandyala Sitaramaraju Another vs Saripella Ramaraju 2 Others on 27 November, 2023

7. Though a query to the Counsel i.e., as to why an Appeal was filed, the Learned Counsel referred to a case in Smt.Kavitha Balaji and another vs. The State of Telangana and others1 to contend that the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is maintainable, notwithstanding the remedy of Appeal. This court does not intend to go into that aspect for the purpose of this case and the disposal may not be seen as a validation to bypass appeal.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1