Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.81 seconds)
Documents citing Pandru Khadia vs State Of Orissa on 16 September, 1991

State vs Mohd. Hassan Etc. on 11 July, 2011

In case law titled Pandra Khadia Vs. State of Orissa , 1992 CRI L.J 762 it is stated in headnote :­ State Vs.Mohd. Hassan etc. FIR No.446/06 Page No. 33 of 38 'Evidence Act. 1872, Ss. 3,8 - Penal Code (1860), Ss.299, 300, 302 - Murder - Proof of - Case based on circumstantial evidence - Motive of accused not proved by prosecution - Held, that since important circumstantial evidence had been disbelieved absence of proof of motive would weigh in favour of accused'.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Kuldeep Trivedi on 22 July, 2011

In case law titled Pandra Khadia Vs. State of Orissa , 1992 CRI L.J 762 it is stated in headnote :­ 'Evidence Act. 1872, Ss. 3,8 - Penal Code (1860), Ss.299, 300, 302 - Murder - Proof of - Case based on circumstantial evidence - Motive of accused not proved by prosecution - State Vs.Kuldeep Trivedi FIR No.812/07 Page No. 40 of 44 Held, that since important circumstantial evidence had been disbelieved absence of proof of motive would weigh in favour of accused'.
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Ajit Singh Chauhan on 29 August, 2012

In case law titled Pandra Khadia Vs. State of Orissa , 1992 CRI L.J 762 it is stated in headnote :­ 'Evidence Act. 1872, Ss. 3,8 - Penal Code (1860), Ss.299, 300, 302 - Murder - Proof of - Case based on circumstantial evidence - Motive of accused not proved by prosecution - Held, that since important circumstantial evidence had been disbelieved absence of proof of motive would weigh in favour of accused'.
Delhi District Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Bhagat Singh Sharma Etc. on 31 August, 2012

In case law titled Pandra Khadia Vs. State of Orissa , 1992 CRI L.J 762 it is stated in headnote :­ 'Evidence Act. 1872, Ss. 3,8 - Penal Code (1860), Ss.299, 300, 302 - Murder - Proof of - Case based on circumstantial evidence - Motive of accused not proved by prosecution - Held, that since important circumstantial evidence had been disbelieved absence of proof of motive would weigh in favour of accused'.
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Deepak Verma Etc on 29 September, 2012

In case law titled Pandra Khadia Vs. State of Orissa , 1992 CRI L.J 762 it is stated in headnote :­ 'Evidence Act. 1872, Ss. 3,8 - Penal Code (1860), Ss. 299, 300, 302 - Murder - Proof of - Case based on circumstantial evidence - Motive of accused not proved by prosecution - Held, that since important circumstantial evidence had been disbelieved absence of proof of motive would weigh in favour of accused'.
Delhi District Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next