Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (2.14 seconds)
Documents citing All India L.P.G. Distributors ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary ... on 21 December, 2001

All India Lpg Distributors Federation ... vs Union Of India on 10 March, 2026

13. The next question is whether the Respondents Nos.2 to 4 have the right to transfer the customers of the Petitioner to other Distributors. This issue is dealt with by this Court in four Division Bench decisions, namely, All India L.P.G. Distributors Federation (supra), Vembanad Gas Agencies (supra), K. Ashraf (supra) and Confederation of Consumer Vigilance Centre (supra). The earlier decisions are followed in the later decisions. I am bound by those authoritative pronouncements.
Kerala High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sree Narayana Indane Services vs Union Of India on 10 March, 2026

13. The next question is whether the Respondents Nos.2 to 4 have the right to transfer the customers of the Petitioner to other Distributors. This issue is dealt with by this Court in four Division Bench decisions, namely, All India L.P.G. Distributors Federation (supra), Vembanad Gas Agencies (supra), K. Ashraf (supra) and Confederation of Consumer Vigilance Centre (supra). The earlier decisions are followed in the later decisions. I am bound by those authoritative pronouncements.
Kerala High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

All India Lpg Distributors Fed. ... vs Union Of India And Others on 26 May, 2014

(v) the mandatory video recording of draw of lot be provided for." A Division Bench of this Court in All India LPG Distributors Federation (North West Region) Vs. Union of India, 2002 (2) RCR (Civil) 46, while considering the appointment of distributorship by the Indian Oil Companies, had examined the instructions issued by the Government of India, by which the oil marketing companies have been directed to close down the extension counters set-up by the dealers and transfer all the consumers enrolled through these counters to the newly-commissioned distributors. While dismissing the writ petition, it was held that there was no violation of principles of natural justice. It was also held that there was no violation of any contractual or legal rights by the oil marketing companies. The action of the respondents was in conformity with the terms of appointment letters and agreement signed by both the parties. Each distributor had been allotted an area of operation and as per the letter of allotment, this area, could be reduced. To meet a particular situation, the respondents-oil companies had permitted opening of extension counters. As per the letter of appointment, it is stipulated that number of customers allotted to a particular distributor, can be varied, increased or decreased. Subsequently, new dealers were appointed and to enable them to sustain their business, the instructions were issued by the Government of India, directing the petitioners (in that case) to close down their extension counters. The newly appointed distributors had spent huge amount of money on construction of godowns and other facilities. Their expenditure was much more than the amount spent by the old distributors on opening of the extension counters. The equity was held to be in favour of newly appointed distributors and their claim was legitimate. In paragraph 35 of the aforesaid Prasher Ajay 2014.05.27 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No. 24254 of 2013 (O&M) 11 judgment, the Division Bench has observed as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - R Bahri - Full Document

M/S H.S. Gas Service And Others vs Union Of India And Others on 9 February, 2016

16. A Division Bench of this Court in All India LPG Distributors Federation (North West Region) Vs. Union of India, 2002 (2) RCR (Civil) 46, while considering the appointment of distributorship by the Indian Oil Companies, had examined the instructions issued by the Government of India, by which the oil marketing companies have been CWP No.11032 of 2014 #14# directed to close down the extension counters set- up by the dealers and transfer all the consumers enrolled through these counters to the newly- commissioned distributors. While dismissing the writ petition, it was held that there was no violation of principles of natural justice. It was also held that there was no violation of any contractual or legal rights by the oil marketing companies. The action of the respondents was in conformity with the terms of appointment letters and agreement signed by both the parties. Each distributor had been allotted an area of operation and as per the letter of allotment, this area, could be reduced. To meet a particular situation, the respondents-oil companies had permitted opening of extension counters. As per the letter of appointment, it is stipulated that number of customers allotted to a particular distributor, can be varied, increased or decreased. Subsequently, new dealers were appointed and to enable them to sustain their business, the instructions were issued by the Government of India, directing the petitioners (in that case) to close down their extension counters. The newly appointed distributors had spent huge amount of money on construction of godowns and other facilities. Their expenditure was much more than the amount spent by the old distributors on opening of the extension counters. The equity was held to be in favour of newly appointed distributors and their claim was legitimate. In paragraph 35 of the aforesaid judgment, the Division Bench has observed as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4 - R K Jain - Full Document
1