Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 93 (0.68 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Himachal Pradesh & Anr vs Padam Dev & Ors on 16 April, 2002

Niranjan Singh And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 7 December, 2004

In State of H.P. and Ors. v. Padam Dev, (2002) 4 SCC 510, the Supreme Court while considering the policy of training of persons as veterinary pharmacists to persons in Gopal Sahayak Yojna and not to those trained under Dairy Scheme held that where the classification between the candidates is distinct and clearly defined as regards the eligibility criteria, the distinction made between the candidates of two schemes was permissible as the classification was founded on an intelligible differentia and where it is shown that the differentia has a rationale relation to the object sought to be achieved by the policy decision, the Courts should not interfere.
Allahabad High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 7 - S Ambwani - Full Document

Pawan Kumar Sharma vs State Of U.P. And 3 Ors on 14 October, 2015

19. The aforementioned Government orders reflects the policy decision of the State Government. It is well settled that the Courts, in exercise of their power of judicial review did not ordinarily interfere with the policy decisions of the executive unless the policy can be faulted on account of malafide, unreasonableness, arbitrariness or unfairness etc. If the policy cannot be faulted on any of these grounds, the policy cannot be said to be invalid. Courts cannot question the wisdom of the government in taking a policy decision. Generally policy cannot be tested in a court of law. The government is entitled to lay down its policy which cannot be subjected to judicial review except in the circumstances mentioned above. Reference in this regard may be had to the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases reported in (1993) 66 ELT 3 SC, (Subhash Photographics Vs. Union of India) para-13, (1996) 2 SCC 405 (Delhi Science Forum Vs. Union of India and another) para-7, JT (2006) 6 SC 500 (Ekta Shakti Foundation Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi para-12, AIR 1997 SC 128 (Krishnan Kakkanth Vs. Govt. of Kerla and others) para-34, (2002) 6 SCC 252 (State of Rajasthan and others Vs. Lata Arun) para -10 and 12, (2002) 4 SCC 510 (State of H.P. and another Vs. Padam Dev and others) para-13, AIR 1996 SC 149 (State of H.P. and others Vs. Ganesh Wood Products and others) para-51, 54 and 57, (2001) 3 SCC 635 (Sugar Works Ltd. Vs. Delhi Administration and others), AIR 1973 SC 588 (State of Maharastra and others Vs. Lok Shiksha Sansthan and others, (AIR 1990 SC 1277) M/s Shri Sita Ram Sugar Co. Ltd. and another vs. Union of India, (1998 4 SCC 117 (State of Punjab and others Vs. Ram Lubhaya Bagga and others) para- 25 and 26) JT (2001) 10 SC 466 para 91 to 99 (Balco Employees Union Regd. Vs. Union of India and others, (AIR 1998 SC 137 para-17) Gyan Prakash Vs. Union of India, (2007) 6 SCC 44 (Ram Singh Vijay Pal Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) para -14.
Allahabad High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 1 - S P Kesarwani - Full Document

Dev Raj & Ors vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Anr on 26 June, 2018

12. Accordingly, looking into all attending facts and circumstances, I find this case to be a fit case to exercise jurisdiction vested in this Court, under Section 482 of the Code and accordingly F.I.R No.23/14, dated 19.2.2014, under Sections 323, 324 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, Gagret, District Una, H.P., pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Court No.II, Amb, District Una, titled State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Dev Raj & ors, is ordered to be quashed and consequently, the proceedings pending before the learned Magistrate arising out of the aforesaid FIR, are also ordered to be quashed.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 7 - C B Barowalia - Full Document

C482/2384/2019 on 21 January, 2022

Consequently, the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 86 of 2019, "State vs. Padam and other" for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 504 and 506 IPC and under Sections 3 (1) R of SC/ST Act, registered at P.S. Khanpur, District Haridwar pending in the Court of Juvenile Justice Board, Haridwar are hereby quashed, so far it relates to the present applicants only.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - N S Dhanik - Full Document

Guddu Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 21 March, 2022

35. Unless a policy decision is demonstrably capricious or arbitrary and not informed by any reason or is discriminatory or infringing any statute of Constitution, it cannot be the subject of a judicial interference in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India [see. State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. Vs. Padam Dev and Ors., (2002) 4 SCC 510 and State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Lata Arun (2002) 6 SCC 252]. The Patna High Court CWJC No.2538 of 2021 dt.21-03-2022 91/91 aforesaid decisions are only illustrative in nature which support the Court's opinion.
Patna High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Munna Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 21 March, 2022

35. Unless a policy decision is demonstrably capricious or arbitrary and not informed by any reason or is discriminatory or infringing any statute of Constitution, it cannot be the subject of a judicial interference in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India [see. State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. Vs. Padam Dev and Ors., (2002) 4 SCC 510 and State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Lata Arun (2002) 6 SCC 252]. The Patna High Court CWJC No.2538 of 2021 dt.21-03-2022 91/91 aforesaid decisions are only illustrative in nature which support the Court's opinion.
Patna High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Ramprabesh Pandit vs The State Of Bihar on 21 March, 2022

35. Unless a policy decision is demonstrably capricious or arbitrary and not informed by any reason or is discriminatory or infringing any statute of Constitution, it cannot be the subject of a judicial interference in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India [see. State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. Vs. Padam Dev and Ors., (2002) 4 SCC 510 and State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Lata Arun (2002) 6 SCC 252]. The Patna High Court CWJC No.2538 of 2021 dt.21-03-2022 91/91 aforesaid decisions are only illustrative in nature which support the Court's opinion.
Patna High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next