Apollo Pipes Ltd vs Nirmal Polymers on 7 January, 2025
31. It was also held by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, in
case titled as, ''Inter Ikea Systems BV vs. Imtiaz Ahmed',
(Supra), as under :
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.94 seconds)Hotels.Com,Lp vs Barath M L And Anr on 26 September, 2025
36. The decision in Inter Ikea Systems BV v. Imtiaz Ahamed (supra) and
Inter Ikea Systems BV v. Harish Chaudhary (supra) further supports the
Plaintiff's right to seek damages and recover costs even when the
Defendants are proceeded ex-parte.
Ashok Kumar Gupta & Anr. vs Vikas & Ors. on 1 September, 2023
In a similar matter where the Defendant
chose to stay away from the court proceeding and not
participate or raise any defence, the Court in CS(OS)
3295/2014 titled M/s Inter Ikea Systems BV Anr. v.
Imtiaz Ahamed & Anr. vide judgment dated 9th
September, 2016 observed as under:
Hsil Limited vs Sanjay Ceramic Works & Anr. on 8 January, 2019
In support of his submission he relies
on Inter Ikea Systems BV & Anr. Vs. Imtiaz Ahamed & Anr., 237 (2017)
DLT 247, Cartier International AG & Ors. Vs. Gaurav Bhatia & Ors., 226
(2016) DLT 662, Christian Louboutin SAS Vs. Ashish Bansal & Anr.,
CS(COMM) 503/2016 dated 31st July, 2018, Jokey International Inc. &
Anr. Vs. R. Chandra Mohan & Ors., 2014 (211) DLT 757, Lachhman Das
Behari Lal Vs. Ghanshyam Das Jetha Nand, 2007 (35) PTC 693 (Del).
Strix Ltd vs Maharaja Appliances Limited on 20 October, 2023
In Inter Ikea
Systems BV & Ors. v. Imtiaz Ahamed and Ors., MANU/DE/3680/2016, it is
clearly laid down by this Court that a party who chooses not to participate in
the court proceedings cannot enjoy an advantage and a premium for such
conduct. In the opinion of this Court, the Defendant has deliberately chosen
to stay away from the proceedings merely to ensure that it is not required to
produce its accounts. The Plaintiff is entitled to be monetarily compensated
for the infringement committed by the Defendant. Passing of a decree of
rendition of accounts at this stage also clearly appears to be non-feasible as
the Defendant would again avoid the court proceedings. Accordingly, this
Court is of the opinion that on an assessment of the evidence on record,
monetary compensation deserves to be awarded.
Banyan Tree Holdings Limited vs M/S Angsana Thai Spa & Ors. on 1 December, 2023
In M/s
Inter Ikea Systems BV v. Imtiaz Ahamed & Anr [Judgment dated 9th
September, 2016, CS (OS) 3295/2014], this Court observed as follows:
Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd vs Berachah Sales Corporation & Ors. on 2 April, 2024
In M/s Inter Ikea Systems BV v. Imtiaz Ahamed & Anr [decision dated 9th
September, 2016, CS (OS) 3295/2014], this Court observed as follows:
Puma Se vs Vir Interntional on 24 April, 2024
In Inter Ikea Systems BV Anr vs. Imtiaz Ahamed and
Another, (2017) 237 DLT 247, Hon'ble High Court of Delhi
held, as under:
Communication Components Antenna Inc. vs Mobi Antenna Technologies(Shenzhen) ... on 16 May, 2024
In Inter Ikea Systems BV v. Imtiaz Ahamed, 2016 SCC
OnLine Del 6717, it is clearly laid down by this Court that a party who
chooses not to participate in the court proceedings cannot enjoy an
advantage and a premium for such conduct. In the opinion of this Court,
the Defendant has deliberately chosen to stay away from the proceedings
merely to ensure that it is not required to produce its accounts. The
Plaintiff is entitled to be monetarily compensated for the infringement
committed by the Defendant. Passing of a decree of rendition of accounts
at this stage also clearly appears to be non-feasible as the Defendant
would again avoid the court proceedings. Accordingly, this Court is of the
opinion that on an assessment of the evidence on record, monetary
compensation deserves to be awarded.
M K Auto Clutch Co And Anr vs Swapnil Jain And Ors on 13 September, 2024
In Inter Ikea Systems BV Anr vs. Imtiaz Ahamed and
Another, (2017) 237 DLT 247, Hon'ble High Court of Delhi
held, as under: