citedby: 984533

1 - 4 of 4 (0.44 seconds)

Documents citing Satbeer Singh vs State on 13 October, 2004

Counsel Has Referred To Decisions In ... vs . State on 27 November, 2012

In this regard learned counsel has rightly FIR No. 121/2007 27 referred to decision in Satbeer Singh vs. State 2004 (3) CC Cases(HC) 99, Kuldeep K. Mahato vs. State of Bihar 1998 CAR 424 and Ramu v. State of Haryana 2002 (1) CC Cases (HC) 127.

Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Satinder Singh And Smt. Usha vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 18 December, 2006

26. This Court in an authority reported as Satbeer Singh v. State , was pleased to observe:

Delhi High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 54 - J M Malik - Full Document

State vs . : Azim on 6 April, 2015

13.2 In Satbeer Singh Vs. State 2004 VII AD (DELHI) 623, wherein the age of prosecutrix was informed by the radiologist as 17 years whereas her age was informed by the prosecutrix as 14 years. It was held that the evidence suggested that the prosecutrix was a willing party and that she was tutored and that she implicated the accused.

Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ld. Counsel Has Relied Upon Judgments ... vs . State, 1999 (4) on 8 October, 2007

In support of his contentions Ld. Counsel has relied upon judgments Satbeer Vs. State, 1999 (4) RCC 164. On the other hand, Ld. APP for the State has argued that prosecution has proved its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Counsel Has Referred To Decisions In ... vs . State on 27 November, 2012

Satinder Singh And Smt. Usha vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 18 December, 2006

State vs . : Azim on 6 April, 2015

Ld. Counsel Has Relied Upon Judgments ... vs . State, 1999 (4) on 8 October, 2007