citedby: 98725148

Vishram Singh Yadav @ Vishram Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko on 1 October, 2024

In view of above, this Court finds that the case of the applicant is covered by the judgments passed in the case of Rahtu Lal @ Rahtu Ram @ Divyanand and others (Supra), Somnath Paul (supra), D.P. Titus (supra), State Of U.P. vs Raja Ram (supra), S. Subramanium And Ors. (supra) and Dr. Pradeep Kumar (supra).

Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Smt. Vandana Saxena And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 4 May, 2026

In support of his submission, learned counsel for applicants place reliance upon a judgement of this Court passed in the case of Rahtu Lal @ Rahtu Ram @ Divyanand & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another passed in Application U/s 482/378/407 No. 1421 of 2004, relevant paragraph of the said judgment is being quoted hereinbelow:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Deepak vs State Of U.P. And Another on 5 May, 2026

In support of his submission, learned counsel for applicant place reliance upon a judgement of this Court passed in the case of Rahtu Lal @ Rahtu Ram @ Divyanand & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another passed in Application U/s 482/378/407 No. 1421 of 2004, relevant paragraph of the said judgment is being quoted hereinbelow:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Vishnu Pratap Singh And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 4 May, 2026

In support of his submission, learned counsel for applicants place reliance upon a judgement of this Court passed in the case of Rahtu Lal @ Rahtu Ram @ Divyanand & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another passed in Application U/s 482/378/407 No. 1421 of 2004, relevant paragraph of the said judgment is being quoted hereinbelow:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Prashant Sharma vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. ... on 2 September, 2024

Since legal requirement as provided under Section 441 IPC for sending of notice to trespasser is not fulfilled, therefore, criminal prosecution started on the basis of charge sheet submitted in the matter is the abuse of the process of law as has been held by this Court in the case of Rahtu Lal @ Rahtu Ram @ Divyanand and others (Supra).

Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Puneet Kumar Sahni vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 17 September, 2024

Since legal requirement as provided under Section 441 IPC for sending of notice to trespasser is not fulfilled, therefore, criminal prosecution started on the basis of charge sheet submitted in the matter is the abuse of the process of law as has been held by this Court in the case of Rahtu Lal @ Rahtu Ram @ Divyanand and others (Supra).

Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Radhey Shyam Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home ... on 25 November, 2024

Since legal requirement as provided under Section 441 IPC for sending of notice to trespasser is not fulfilled, therefore, criminal prosecution started on the basis of charge sheet submitted in the matter is the abuse of the process of law as has been held by this Court in the case of Rahtu Lal @ Rahtu Ram @ Divyanand and others (Supra).

Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Salman @ Mohammad Gulam Husain And ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. ... on 12 March, 2025

Since legal requirement as provided under Section 441 IPC for sending of notice to trespasser is not fulfilled, therefore, criminal prosecution started on the basis of charge sheet submitted in the matter is the abuse of the process of law, as has been held by this Court in the case of Rahtu Lal @ Rahtu Ram @ Divyanand and others (Supra).

Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Yusuf And 5 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 5 May, 2026

In support of his submission, learned counsel for applicants place reliance upon a judgement of this Court passed in the case of Rahtu Lal @ Rahtu Ram @ Divyanand & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another passed in Application U/s 482/378/407 No. 1421 of 2004, relevant paragraph of the said judgment is being quoted hereinbelow:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results