Parvati Devi vs State Of U.P. on 26 June, 2020
It is also submitted that the applicant moved an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No.38217 of 2016 (Shiv Nath Yadav And Another Vs. State of U.P. and Another), which was rejected vide order dated 30.10.2019. Thereafter, the applicant moved a discharge application, which was also rejected on 06.01.2020. In para 21 of the counter affidavit it is mentioned that the applicant is permanent resident of village Tala, Pargana Katehar, Tehsil and District Varanasi and informant is resident of village Odar, Pargana Kolasla, Tehsil and District Varanasi. The fact regarding the address has been discussed by this Court in its order dated 30.10.2019. Against the order dated 09.07.2003, Parvati Devi wife of complainant and Gayatri Devi wife of younger brother of complaint filed Revision No. 755 of 2010 before the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Varanasi. Thereafter, Revision No.1052/232 and Revision No.755 of 2010 were clubbed and on behest of complainant both the revisions were transferred to Chief Revision Officer, who by order dated 12.08.2014 set aside the orders dated 20.11.2002 and 09.07.2003 and the matter was remanded to Consolidation Officer to decide the matter afresh. He further, submits that on 02.01.2020, in the lower court bail application of the applicant was rejected and hue and cry was raised on behalf of husband of the applicant, regarding which papers are annexed at page no.76 of the counter affidavit. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled for bail.