Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 60 (4.27 seconds)
Documents citing Krishna Kumar Narula Etc vs The State Of Jammu And Kashmir & Ors on 1 March, 1967

M/S Blooms Liquors Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 30 September, 2016

Patna High Court CWJC No.6675 of 2016 dt.30-09-2016 -99- 88.05. To me, it is unnecessary to trace the various judgments of the Supreme Court through the period of time dealing with the aspect of trade and business in liquor. Suffice to say that the Constitution Bench, in the case of Krishan Kumar Narula and another Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others, (AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1368), clearly held that the right to do business in liquor was a fundamental right; but the restrictions would be reasonable even to the extent of prohibition.
Patna High Court Cites 130 - Cited by 0 - N P Singh - Full Document

Lt. Col. ( Retd.) Shiv Nath Jha vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 30 September, 2016

Patna High Court CWJC No.6675 of 2016 dt.30-09-2016 -99- 88.05. To me, it is unnecessary to trace the various judgments of the Supreme Court through the period of time dealing with the aspect of trade and business in liquor. Suffice to say that the Constitution Bench, in the case of Krishan Kumar Narula and another Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others, (AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1368), clearly held that the right to do business in liquor was a fundamental right; but the restrictions would be reasonable even to the extent of prohibition.
Patna High Court Cites 130 - Cited by 0 - N P Singh - Full Document

Dr. Priya Ranjan vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 30 September, 2016

Patna High Court CWJC No.6675 of 2016 dt.30-09-2016 -99- 88.05. To me, it is unnecessary to trace the various judgments of the Supreme Court through the period of time dealing with the aspect of trade and business in liquor. Suffice to say that the Constitution Bench, in the case of Krishan Kumar Narula and another Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others, (AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1368), clearly held that the right to do business in liquor was a fundamental right; but the restrictions would be reasonable even to the extent of prohibition.
Patna High Court Cites 130 - Cited by 0 - N P Singh - Full Document

Manoj Kumar & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 30 September, 2016

Patna High Court CWJC No.6675 of 2016 dt.30-09-2016 -99- 88.05. To me, it is unnecessary to trace the various judgments of the Supreme Court through the period of time dealing with the aspect of trade and business in liquor. Suffice to say that the Constitution Bench, in the case of Krishan Kumar Narula and another Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others, (AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1368), clearly held that the right to do business in liquor was a fundamental right; but the restrictions would be reasonable even to the extent of prohibition.
Patna High Court Cites 130 - Cited by 0 - N P Singh - Full Document

Dr. Anil Kumar Prasad Sinha vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 30 September, 2016

Patna High Court CWJC No.6675 of 2016 dt.30-09-2016 -99- 88.05. To me, it is unnecessary to trace the various judgments of the Supreme Court through the period of time dealing with the aspect of trade and business in liquor. Suffice to say that the Constitution Bench, in the case of Krishan Kumar Narula and another Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others, (AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1368), clearly held that the right to do business in liquor was a fundamental right; but the restrictions would be reasonable even to the extent of prohibition.
Patna High Court Cites 130 - Cited by 0 - N P Singh - Full Document

Ravi Bhushan Singh & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 30 September, 2016

Patna High Court CWJC No.6675 of 2016 dt.30-09-2016 -99- 88.05. To me, it is unnecessary to trace the various judgments of the Supreme Court through the period of time dealing with the aspect of trade and business in liquor. Suffice to say that the Constitution Bench, in the case of Krishan Kumar Narula and another Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others, (AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1368), clearly held that the right to do business in liquor was a fundamental right; but the restrictions would be reasonable even to the extent of prohibition.
Patna High Court Cites 130 - Cited by 0 - N P Singh - Full Document

United Breweries Limited A Company ... vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 30 September, 2016

Patna High Court CWJC No.6675 of 2016 dt.30-09-2016 -99- 88.05. To me, it is unnecessary to trace the various judgments of the Supreme Court through the period of time dealing with the aspect of trade and business in liquor. Suffice to say that the Constitution Bench, in the case of Krishan Kumar Narula and another Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others, (AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1368), clearly held that the right to do business in liquor was a fundamental right; but the restrictions would be reasonable even to the extent of prohibition.
Patna High Court Cites 130 - Cited by 5 - N P Singh - Full Document

Shailesh Kumar Sinha vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 30 September, 2016

Patna High Court CWJC No.6675 of 2016 dt.30-09-2016 -99- 88.05. To me, it is unnecessary to trace the various judgments of the Supreme Court through the period of time dealing with the aspect of trade and business in liquor. Suffice to say that the Constitution Bench, in the case of Krishan Kumar Narula and another Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others, (AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1368), clearly held that the right to do business in liquor was a fundamental right; but the restrictions would be reasonable even to the extent of prohibition.
Patna High Court Cites 130 - Cited by 1 - N P Singh - Full Document

The Federation Of Hotel & Restaurant ... vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 30 September, 2016

Patna High Court CWJC No.6675 of 2016 dt.30-09-2016 -99- 88.05. To me, it is unnecessary to trace the various judgments of the Supreme Court through the period of time dealing with the aspect of trade and business in liquor. Suffice to say that the Constitution Bench, in the case of Krishan Kumar Narula and another Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others, (AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1368), clearly held that the right to do business in liquor was a fundamental right; but the restrictions would be reasonable even to the extent of prohibition.
Patna High Court Cites 130 - Cited by 0 - N P Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next