Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 190 (1.25 seconds)
Documents citing Modern Dental College &Res.Centre & Ors vs State Of M.P. & Ors on 8 September, 2010

Deepanshu Bhadoriya And Ors. vs Medical Council Of India And Ors. on 7 August, 2019

In relation to this aspect, it is essential to observe that in view of the catena of verdicts relied upon on behalf of the MCI, and the State of Madhya Pradesh and the Directorate of Medical Education and the law laid down in Modern Dental College & Research Centre & Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. (supra) & State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jainarayan Chouksey & Ors. (supra), the aspect of students having been granted admission without participation in the centralized counseling conducted by the State Government Agency concerned as regulated by the MCI specifically in view of the factum that the Regulations in the instant case of the State of Madhya Pradesh existed from the year 2007 onwards, of which the petitioners have W.P. (C) 10933/2018 Page 73 of 75 essentially to have had knowledge and the respondent no.4 equally has to have had knowledge thereof, the discharge of the petitioners by the respondent no.1 vide the impugned communications dated 19.07.2017, 06.08.2017, 23.08.2017, 30.12.2017 and 25.08.2017, cannot be faulted.
Delhi High Court Cites 62 - Cited by 2 - A Malhotra - Full Document

Dr.M.Hemalatha vs / on 2 May, 2017

(g)In Modern Dental College and Research Centre and Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others reported in (2016) 7 Supreme Court Cases 353, a Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that professional, minority educational institutions are also bound by State's regulatory measures. Further, even reservation of SC, ST and OBC in educational institutions has been upheld in the said judgment.
Madras High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - N Kirubakaran - Full Document

Ahmedabad vs Gujarat on 6 May, 2011

13. So far as the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Modern Dental College and Research Centre vs. State of MP, reported in AIR 2009 SC 2432 is concerned, from para 31, it will be evident that it was a suggestion made by the Supreme Court in the particular case and no ratio was laid down by the Supreme Court and will be evident from para 33 of the said judgment, wherein the following observations were made :-
Gujarat High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S J Mukhopadhaya - Full Document

Bihar State Minority Education College ... vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 27 October, 2016

As has been indicated above, the Supreme Court, in case of Modern Dental College (supra), has held that for fixing the fee structure, factors, like infrastructure and facilities, investment made, salaries paid to the teachers and staff and future plans for expansion and/or betterment for institution, are to be kept in mind, subject to two restrictions, namely, non-profiteering and non-charging of capitation fee.
Patna High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Teachers Training College & Ors vs The Chancellor Of The Universities Of ... on 27 October, 2016

As has been indicated above, the Supreme Court, in case of Modern Dental College (supra), has held that for fixing the fee structure, factors, like infrastructure and facilities, investment made, salaries paid to the teachers and staff and future plans for expansion and/or betterment for institution, are to be kept in mind, subject to two restrictions, namely, non-profiteering and non-charging of capitation fee.
Patna High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Baikunth Teachers Training College vs The Chancellor Of The University Of ... on 27 October, 2016

As has been indicated above, the Supreme Court, in case of Modern Dental College (supra), has held that for fixing the fee structure, factors, like infrastructure and facilities, investment made, salaries paid to the teachers and staff and future plans for expansion and/or betterment for institution, are to be kept in mind, subject to two restrictions, namely, non-profiteering and non-charging of capitation fee.
Patna High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Nezamia College Of Education vs The Chancellor Of The Universities Of ... on 27 October, 2016

As has been indicated above, the Supreme Court, in case of Modern Dental College (supra), has held that for fixing the fee structure, factors, like infrastructure and facilities, investment made, salaries paid to the teachers and staff and future plans for expansion and/or betterment for institution, are to be kept in mind, subject to two restrictions, namely, non-profiteering and non-charging of capitation fee.
Patna High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Ramadhar Singh Teachers Training ... vs The Chancellor Of The University Of ... on 27 October, 2016

As has been indicated above, the Supreme Court, in case of Modern Dental College (supra), has held that for fixing the fee structure, factors, like infrastructure and facilities, investment made, salaries paid to the teachers and staff and future plans for expansion and/or betterment for institution, are to be kept in mind, subject to two restrictions, namely, non-profiteering and non-charging of capitation fee.
Patna High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Veerayatan B. Ed. College vs The Chancelor Of The Universities Of ... on 27 October, 2016

As has been indicated above, the Supreme Court, in case of Modern Dental College (supra), has held that for fixing the fee structure, factors, like infrastructure and facilities, investment made, salaries paid to the teachers and staff and future plans for expansion and/or betterment for institution, are to be kept in mind, subject to two restrictions, namely, non-profiteering and non-charging of capitation fee.
Patna High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next