Dr Prasuna Chiluka vs National Board Of Examinations & Anr. on 21 May, 2024
55. Mr. Kirtiman Singh also disputes the petitioner's contention
that the stipulation that extension of leave for more than a year could
result ipso facto in the cancellation of her DrNB candidature, could
not be enforced upon her as it was only contained in a FAQ and not in
the Leave Rules. For the proposition that the FAQs also constituted
part of the applicable Rules, Mr. Kirtiman Singh places reliance on
paras 43 to 46 and 102 of Prakash Gupta v. S.E.B.I.4; paras 14 and 27
of Neeraj Sharma v. U.O.I.5; paras 37 and 38 of Vishal Dahiya v.
Medical Counselling Committee6 and paras 26, 54, 59 and 61 of
2 2020 SCC Online Del 725
3 (2014) 13 SCC 692
4 (2021) 17 SCC 451
5 2023 SCC Online Del 923
6 2022 SCC Online Del 477
Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C) 15345/2023 Page 25 of 74
Digitally Signed By:AJIT Digitally Signed
KUMAR By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN
HARI SHANKAR
Signing Date:21.05.2024 Signing Date:21.05.2024
17:56:16 17:55:26
Defsys Solutions Private Ltd. v. UOI7.