Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.59 seconds)

Haryana Urban Development Authority vs Smt. Raj Dulhari And Ors. on 5 May, 1998

In Kabul Singh v. Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (1997) 115 Pun LR 713 : (1997 AIHC 1719), a Division Bench considered the prayer made by the petitioners for issuance of a mandamus to be allotted HIG single storey dwelling units on the ground that the Punjab Housing Development Board had while inviting applications made promise for allotment of the flats. After noticing the relevant statutory provisions, the Court held as under (at p. 1725. para 9 of AIHC):---
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 3 - V S Aggarwal - Full Document

Surjit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 2 March, 2015

A Division Bench of this Court in a judgment reported as (2001)(2) PLR 759 titled Dr. K.L. Sharma v. State of Punjab, referred to judgment of Surjit Singh's case (supra); 1997(2) RRR (Civil) 498 (P&H) titled Kabul Singh and others v. Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority and CWP No.8905 of 1997 titled The Express Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. and others v. State of Haryana through its Chief Secretary and others, decided on GULATI DIWAKER 2015.03.03 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP Nos.12933 of 2001; 8 CWP No.19680 of 2001 and CWP No.1552 of 2002 03.10.1997, to hold that by submitting application in pursuance of the advertisement issued, they did not acquire a right to be allotted plots.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - H Gupta - Full Document

Surinder Kumar Garg And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Another on 26 August, 2019

In Kabul Singh and others v. Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority, 1997(1) P.L.R. 713 : 1997(2) RRR 498, a Division Bench considered the prayer made by the petitioners for issuance of a mandamus to be allotted HIG single storey dwelling units on the ground that the Punjab Housing Development Board had while inviting applications made promise for allotment of the flats. After noticing the relevant statutory provisions, the Court held as under :-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Mittal - Full Document

Bhupinder Kumar Through His Wife Suman ... vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 7 August, 2015

During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioners also referred to a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Kabul Singh Vs. Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority 1997 (1) PLR 713, wherein the issue considered was, as to whether the petitioner has a legal right to be allotted HIG (Single Storey) category dwelling unit or similar property on the application made by him pursuant to a notice (Annexure P-1). The Court held that the petitioner, who applied pursuant to Annexure P-1, does not acquire perennial right of consideration for allotment of HIG house for all times to come. It has been held to the following effect:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1