Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.39 seconds)

National Products vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mysore on 18 March, 1976

Inasmuch as the levy of interest is a part of the process of assessment, it is open to an assessee to dispute the levy in appeal provided he limits himself to the ground that he is not liable to the levy at all, Their Lordships approved the observations of the Karnataka High Court in National Products v. CIT [1977] 108 ITR 935, where the very same question was in issue and the court held that it is open to an assessee to contend in the appeal against an order of assessment that he is not liable to pay advance tax at all or the amount of advance tax determined as payable by the Income-tax Officer is not correct. But if the assessee does not dispute the amount of advance tax determined as payable by the Income-tax Officer, he cannot merely object to the levy of penal interest or question its quantum.

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Bharat Motors Service on 26 November, 1984

The Karnataka High Court followed the decision in Notional Products [19771 108 ITR 935 (Kar), though that related to the levy of interest under Sections 139(8) and 215 and applied it to a case arising under Section 214 in the decision in CIT v. Bharat Motor Service [1987] 163 ITR 843 (Kar). In that case, the second question referred to the High Court was about the appealability of an Income-tax Officer's refusal to grant interest under Section 214. The Karnataka High Court equated the case with that in National Products [1977] 108 ITR 935 (Kar) and held that the order refusing interest under Section 214 was also appealable when the assessment itself was being challenged on other grounds. We are in agreement with this view.
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1