Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.73 seconds)
Dinesh @ Ganeshi And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 2 December, 2020 cites

Mohd. Yousuf vs Smt. Afaq Jahan & Anr on 2 January, 2006

There is no particular format for a complaint. The Apex Court has also expounded in Mohd. Yusuf vs. Afaq Jahan reported in (2006) 1 SCC, 627 that there is no particular format for a complaint, even nomenclature is also inconsequential. A petition addressed to Magistrate containing an allegation that an offence has been committed and prayed for suitable action against the culprits, is sufficient to treat the same as a complaint.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 565 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Virendra Singh Mast And Anr vs State Of U.P. And Another on 7 December, 2019

It is clear that initially vide notification dated 02.08.1984 Government of U.P. has treated the offence under Section 506 I.P.C. as cognizable and non-bailable. The aforesaid promulgation of Government of U.P. was declared illegal by the Court in the case of Virendra Singh (Supra). At present there is no doubt that the offence under Section 506 IPC is non-cognizable and bailable. In light of proposition of law as mentioned above, there is no room to doubt that case filed under Section 506 IPC cannot be proceeded as police case and the learned Magistrate should treat it as a complaint case.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - M R Chauhan - Full Document
1