Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.41 seconds)
Chacha Saree Bazar Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs Chacha Cloth House on 12 February, 2026 cites

Amritdhara Pharmacy vs Satyadeo Gupta on 27 April, 1962

FAO (COMM) 217/2025 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 11 of 32 KUMAR Signing Date:16.02.2026 20:07:05 himself the registered proprietor or permissive user, uses a mark which is deceptively similar to a registered trade mark of another, for goods or services which are identical or deceptively similar to the goods or services in respect of which the mark of the other is registered, and such usage results in likelihood of confusion or likelihood of the public believing an association between the two marks, infringement results. The "public" is represented by a consumer of average intelligence and imperfect recollection, as held by the Supreme Court in Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satyadeo Gupta14, Satyam Infoway Ltd v Siffynet Solutions (P) Ltd15, and several other decisions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 70 - S K Das - Full Document

Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma vs Navaratna Pharmaceutical ... on 20 October, 1964

In Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma v. Navratna 25 Pharmaceuticals Laboratories , this Court underscored that the correct test for trademark infringement is whether, when considered in its entirety, the defendant's mark is deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered mark. The Court expressly cautioned against isolating individual parts of a composite mark, as such an approach disregard how consumers actually experience and recall trademarks.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 512 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document
1