Chandrakant Sahu vs Coal India Limited 47 Wa/48/2018 Indra ... on 10 December, 2019
22. Mr. Bansal further submits that the fact that the appellant has an
outlet in Sarojni Nagar, New Delhi and the respondent has an outlet in
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, is irrelevant to the aspect of infringement
and injunction and relies, for this purpose on the judgment of the
Supreme Court in Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah8 which
advises Courts to keep in mind the fact that a party may always choose
to expand its business.