Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)
Prasad Pangannaya @ Narasimha Prasad vs State Of Karnataka on 3 December, 2024 cites

Harikisan vs The State Of Maharasthtra & Others on 31 January, 1962

judgments pertaining to the law of preventive detention including the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in Harikisan [Harikisan v. State of Maharashtra, 1962 SCC OnLine SC 117] , wherein, the provisions of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India have been interpreted, we find that it has been the consistent view of this Court that the grounds on which the liberty of a citizen is curtailed, must be communicated in writing so as to enable him to seek remedial measures against the deprivation of liberty.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 59 - B P Sinha - Full Document

Ram Narayan Singh vs The State Of Delhi And Others on 12 March, 1953

As stated in Ram Narayan Singh v. State of Delhi [(1953) 1 SCC 389: AIR (1953) SC 277] this Court has often reiterated that those who feel called upon to deprive other persons of liberty in the discharge of what they conceive to be their duty must, strictly and scrupulously, observe the forms 26 and rules of law. Whenever that is not done the petitioner would be entitled to a writ of habeas corpus directing his release."
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 123 - M P Sastri - Full Document
1