Hiral P. Harsora And Ors vs Kusum Narottamdas Harsora And Ors on 6 October, 2016
and Ors (supra) agreed with the view of the Kerala High Court in
Hashir (supra) and followed the view of the Supreme Court in Taruna
Batra (supra).
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.62 seconds)Navneet Arora vs Surender Kaur & Ors. on 10 September, 2014
The Delhi High Court in Navneet Arora (supra)
distinguished Taruna Batra and held that Taruna Batra would be applicable
only in the facts where the son and daughter in law were not residing as
members of the `shared household‟ since the residence and kitchen were
separated.
Eveneet Singh vs Prashant Chaudhri & Ors on 20 December, 2010
23. On a consideration of the observations of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.R. Batra vs. Taruna Batra
(2007) 3 SCC 169, on the verdict of this Court in
Eveneet Singh vs. Prashant Chaudhri 177 (2011) DLT
124, on the verdict of the Hon'ble High Court of
Bombay in Rama Rajesh Tiwari vs. Rajesh Dinanath
Tiwari in Writ Petition No.10696/2017, it being
apparent through the pleadings on the record that the
premises in suit do not fall within the category of a
shared household in terms of Section 2 (s) of the
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act,
2005, the substantial questions of law sought to be
urged by the appellant as referred to in para 18
hereinabove do not arise for consideration in the
instant case in as much as the rights of the appellant
CM (M) 1582/2018 Page 28 of 40
and her daughter to live in the premises belonging to
the respondent no.1 i.e. the plaintiff did not exist
beyond the mere licence given to the parents of Aveka
to live in the same, which has already been terminated.
Hamina Kang vs District Magistrate (U.T.) Chandigarh ... on 25 January, 2016
The
Punjab and Haryana High Court in Hamina Kang v. District Magistrate
(U.T.)
Shilpa Tandon vs Harish Chand Tandon & Anr. on 15 November, 2016
21. Reliance was also placed on behalf of the appellant
on the verdict of this Court in Shilpa Tandon vs.
Harish Chand Tandon in RFA (OS) 113/2015, Navneet
Arora vs. Surender Kaur in FAO (OS) 196/2014.
Dr. Rachna Khanna Singh vs Santosh S.P. Singh And Ors. on 24 May, 2019
Thus, the ld. Single Judge was of the opinion that the premises in the case
would not constitute a „shared household‟ but the Court gave her permission
to avail of proceedings for alternate accommodation. Dr. Rachna Khanna
Singh's(supra) case arose out of a civil suit for possession.
Kavita Gambhir vs Hari Chand Gambhir & Anr. on 7 September, 2009
20. Reliance has been placed on behalf of the appellant
on the verdict of this Court in Kavita Gambhir vs. Hari
Chand Gambhir 162 (2009) DLT 459, on the verdict of
the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Sarika
Mahendra Sureka vs. Mahendra 2016 (6) ABR 161,
Eveneet Singh vs. Prashant Chaudhri 177 (2011) DLT
124, on the verdict of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
B.P. Achala Anand vs. S. Appi Reddy (2005) 3SCC 313
: AIR 2005 SC 986 and on the verdict of the Hon'ble
High Court of Allahabad in Neetu Rana vs. State of
U.P. 2016 (2) Appellate Court Record 1797.
A.R.Hashir vs Shima on 10 February, 2015
and Ors (supra) agreed with the view of the Kerala High Court in
Hashir (supra) and followed the view of the Supreme Court in Taruna
Batra (supra).
Smt. Preeti Satija vs Smt. Raj Kumari And Anr. on 15 January, 2014
51. The judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Preeti Satija
(supra) has been challenged before the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal
No.9723/2014.
Mr. Dattatrey Shivaji Mane vs Mrs. Lilabai Shivaji Mane And Ors on 26 June, 2018
In Dattatrey Shivaji Mane v. Lilabai Shivaji Mane and Ors. AIR
2018 Bom 229, the Bombay High Court was considering an order passed by
the maintenance tribunal under the PSC Act, in a writ petition. The Court
observed therein that the petition of the daughter-in-law under the DV Act
was dismissed for default.