Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.17 seconds)

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs P. Kesavan & Anr on 5 April, 2004

In fact, in Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. P. Kesavan & Anr. JT 2004(4) SC 151, the very acquisition Act was challenged and the Supreme Court very categorically held that by virtue of the legal fiction as contained under Section 5(1) of the Act, Bharat Petroleum became a lessee in respect of the leasehold. Therefore, the Public Sector Oil Corporations have to be considered as tenants on account of the legal fiction as contained in the Acquisition Act. Even though the buildings were constructed only by the erstwhile Burmah Shell and Esso Eastern Inc., by virtue of the provisions of Acquisition Act, the respective oil Companies have become entitled to the superstructure and as such, by stepping into the shoes of their predecessor-in-interest, these oil Companies are entitled to the value of the building as compensation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 54 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Ram Dass vs Davinder on 24 March, 2004

49. The Supreme Court in Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/s.Golden Chariot Airport & Anr. [2010(10) Scale 69], held that mere license does not create any estate or interest with which it is concerned. The Supreme Court in Ram Dass vs. Davinder, 2004(3) SCC 684, in the context of the provisions of Rent Control Act, highlighted the distinction between the term "possession" and "occupy". The Supreme Court said ::-
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 26 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1