Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.32 seconds)
Rama Motocorp Private Limited vs M/S Gannayak Cars Private Limited on 14 November, 2025 cites

Maruti Udyog Limited vs Hasmukh Lakshmichand on 26 May, 2009

M/s. Gannayak Cars Private Limited & Ors. 14/11/2025 raised in the complaint mainly pertains to tyres manufactured by the opposite party No.3 M/s. Micheline India Pvt. Ltd., the opposite party No.2 manufacturer of the car is not liable under any circumstances. He has further argued that Hon'ble National Commission in Maruti Udyog Limited Vs. Hasmukh Lakshmichand & Anr., III (2009) CPJ 229 (NC) has defined manufacturing defect as a defect due to which the vehicle cannot function and results in a complete and total breakdown and it was further observed that the vehicle in that case was in running condition and is being used by the complainant on regular basis and it shows that there was no manufacturing defect in the vehicle.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 30 - Full Document

Crompton Greaves Limited & Anr. vs Daimler Chrysler India Privte Limited & ... on 8 July, 2016

Hon'ble Apex Court in the above judgement clearly laid down that, facts of each case has to be examined keeping in mind that transaction, in reference to which the claim has been raised, has any close and direct nexus with the profit generating activity. In the facts of the present case the complainant has contended that the car in question was purchased for personal use of its Director and there is no close and direct nexus between the said car and ordinary profit generation activities of the Complainant company. Hon'ble National Commission in Crompton Greaves Limited & Anr. Vs. Daimler Chrysler India Private Limited & Ors., CC No.51 of 2006, decided on 08.7.2016 has held the following:-
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 5 - Cited by 40 - Full Document

Landmark Cars Pvt. Ltd. vs Frostees Export (India) Pvt. Ltd. & 5 ... on 30 June, 2020

M/s. Gannayak Cars Private Limited & Ors. 14/11/2025 Shanti Developers and Ors. (2020) 2 SCC 26; National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Harsolia Motors & Ors., (2023) 8 SCC 362 and Hon'ble National Commission in Landmark Cars Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Frostees Export (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., MANU/CF/0559/2020 and argued that the car was purchased by the complainant for personal use of its Director and in such a situation the company is qualified to approach Consumer Commission as a consumer under the Act.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

M/S Tata Motors Ltd. vs Harpreet Singh & Anr. on 21 March, 2022

The above judgement of the Hon'ble National Commission is on the facts and events occurred before commencement of present Act of 2019 as in that case original complaint was filed in the year 2005, which travelled up to the Hon'ble National Commission and decided by the above order, in which the provisions envisaged under Section 86 of the Act of 2019 was not available hence the above judgement is not applicable in the facts of the present case. Section 86 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 is as under : -
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Singla & Anr. vs Jaycee Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. & 2 Ors. on 23 August, 2018

He has also placed reliance upon judgement of Hon'ble National Commission in Suresh Singh and Anr. Vs. Jaycee Automobiles Pvt. Ltd., Revision Petition No.3215 of 2016, dated 23.08.2018. Learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 further argued that manufacturer is only liable for manufacturing defects and as the allegations Partly allowed. Page 14 of 25 Complaint Nos.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1