Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.39 seconds)

State Of M.P vs Deshraj & Ors on 29 January, 2004

In the case of State of M.P. v. Deshraj, reported at (2004) 13 SCC 199, the Apex Court held that the distinctive feature of Section 34 is the element of participation in action. The liability of one person for an offence committed by another in the course of criminal act perpetrated by several persons arises under Section 34 if such criminal act is done in furtherance of a common intention of the persons who join in committing the crime. It is not necessary that the acts of the several persons charged with commission of an offence jointly must be the same or identically similar. The acts may be different in character, but must have been actuated by one and the same common intention in order to attract the provision. The relevant para 5 reads as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 42 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1