Search Results Page

Search Results

31 - 40 of 61 (0.28 seconds)
Glorious Investment Limited vs Dunlop International Limited & Anr on 4 November, 2025 cites

Trans Mediterranean Airways vs M/S. Universal Exports & Anr on 15 September, 2011

1956 Cri LJ 326], Engg. Mazdoor Sabha v. Hind Cycles Ltd. [AIR 1963 SC 874], Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. P.N. Sharma [AIR 1965 SC 1595], Rama Rao v. Narayan [(1969) 1 SCC 167 : AIR 1969 SC 724], State of H.P. v. Mahendra Pal [(1999) 4 SCC 43 : AIR 1999 SC 1786] , Keshab Narayan Banerjee v. State of Bihar [(2000) 1 SCC 607 : 2000 SCC (Cri) 272], Indian National Congress (I) v. Institute of Social Welfare [(2002) 5 SCC 685 : AIR 2002 SC 2158], K. Shamrao v. Asstt. Charity Commr. [(2003) 3 SCC 563] , Trans Mediterranean Airways v. Universal Exports [(2011) 10 SCC 316 : (2012) 1 SCC (Civ) 148], SCC p.
Supreme Court of India Cites 57 - Cited by 102 - H L Dattu - Full Document

Nirmala Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 40 Wps/432/2017 ... on 18 May, 2018

(6) Nor because it is a body to which a matter is referred by another body. (See R. v. Electricity Commissioners [R. v. Electricity Commissioners, (1924) 1 KB 171 (CA)])" and observed at: (Shell Co. of Australia Ltd. case [Shell Co. of Australia Ltd. v. Federal Commr. of Taxation, 1931 AC 275 (PC)], AC p. 298) "An Administrative Tribunal may act judicially, but still remain an Administrative Tribunal as distinguished from a Court, strictly so-called. Mere externals do not make a direction to an administrative officer by an ad hoc tribunal an exercise by a court of judicial power."
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4774 - M M Shrivastava - Full Document

Maqbool Hussain vs The State Of Bombay.Jagjit Singhv.The ... on 17 April, 1953

Maqbool Hussain case [Maqbool Hussain v. State of Bombay, (1953) 1 SCC 736 : 1953 SCR 730], above referred to, was followed by this Court in S.A. Venkataraman v. Union of India [S.A. Venkataraman v. Union of India, (1954) 1 SCC 586 : 1954 SCR 1150] where a Constitution Bench of this Court also laid Page 19 of 27 down that both finality and authoritativeness were the essential tests of a judicial pronouncement.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 277 - N H Bhagwati - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3 4   5 6 7 Next