cites: 122217267 doctypes: judgments

Dresser Rand S.A vs Bindal Agro Chem Ltd And K. G. Khosla ... on 12 January, 2006

38. The view taken in Dresser Rand's case (supra) was reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of "Rishi Khan Logistics Private Ltd. v. Board of Trustees of Kandla Port Trust", (2015) 13 SCC 233.

Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 204 - Full Document

Rishi Kiran Logistics P.Ltd vs Board Of Trus. Of Kandla Port Trust&Ors; on 21 April, 2014

38. The view taken in Dresser Rand's case (supra) was reiterated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of "Rishi Khan Logistics Private Ltd. v. Board of Trustees of Kandla Port Trust", (2015) 13 SCC 233.

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 179 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Bhushan Power And Steel Ltd vs S. L. Seal & Ors on 15 December, 2016

39. The nature of the right created under LoI issued and the consequences of non-fulfillment of the conditions contained therein for undue long time is considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of "Bhushan Power and Steel Limited v. S.L. Seal", (2017) 2 SCC 125 wherein it has been held which reads as under:

Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 92 - A K Sikri - Full Document

State Of Tamil Nadu vs Hind Stone Etc on 5 February, 1981

50. So far as the reliance placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the judgment rendered by this court in the case of M/s Maa Vaishno Devi Stone Mines (supra) is concerned, it is evident from the fact of the said case that the application of the petitioner for mining lease has been rejected due to non- submission of the EC. However, in some cases, matter was remitted by revisional authority/ Mines Commissioner before the original authority to take decision afresh, therefore, this court taking into consideration the aforesaid fact of the said case and further taking into consideration that the Mines Commissioner has acted in a very highly arbitrary and discriminatory manner, has directed the revisional authority to pass a fresh order in accordance with law.

Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 204 - O C Reddy - Full Document

Dr. Subramanian Swamy vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors on 6 December, 2014

54. It is settled position of law that the applicability of the judgment is to be tested on the basis of the factual aspect involved in the case, as has been settled by Hon'ble Apex Court in Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors., (2014) 5 SCC 75, paragraph-47 of the said judgment is being reproduced hereinbelow :-

Supreme Court of India Cites 64 - Cited by 195 - S A Bobde - Full Document

Syed Yakoob vs K.S. Radhakrishnan & Others on 7 October, 1963

59. This Court, applying the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court to issue Writ of Certiorari and basing upon the reason assigned hereinabove, is of the view that the order passed by the quasi-judicial authorities, cannot be said to suffer from an error, hence, the same is not fit to be interfered with.

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 1424 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Hari Vishnu Kamath vs Syed Ahmad Ishaque And Others on 9 December, 1954

57. Similarly, in the case of Hari Vishnu Kamath vs. Ahmad Ishaque and Ors., reported in AIR 1955 Supreme Court 233, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held at paragraph-21 as hereunder: -

Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 1109 - Full Document

Sawarn Singh And Anr. vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 19 November, 1975

In the case of Sawarn Singh and Anr. vs. State of Punjab and Ors., reported in (1976) 2 SCC 868, their Lordships, while discussing the power of writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorari, has been pleased to hold at paragraph nos.12 and 13 as hereunder:

Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 53 - R S Sarkaria - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results