Vijay Singh Rao vs State Of Haryana And Anr. on 9 March, 1986
In Vijaya Rao v. State of Rajasthan & another (2005) SCC
(Cri.) 1600, the Supreme Court held that merely using
expressions like "fraudulent representation" and "malafide
intention" does not give rise to an inference that the complaint
discloses the ingredients of the offence of cheating.