Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.62 seconds)
Sb Civil Writ Petition No.9126/14 vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 1 February, 2016 cites

Pratap And Anr vs The State Of Rajasthanand Ors on 27 February, 1996

22. The said decision has been followed by the Supreme Court in case of Pratap Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. (1996) 3 SCC 1, in which it has been held that even if there is no scheme prepared or finalised, under the Housing Board or Urban Improvement Act, acquisition could be validly made under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act for a public purpose.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 120 - B N Kirpal - Full Document

Bharat Singh Kamlesh Kumar Vijay Singh ... vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 7 March, 2002

Similarly in case of Bharat Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (supra), in case of Bimla Devi & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (2014) SCC 583, in case of Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Vs. Jagjit Singh & Ors. (2015) 3 SCC 208, in case of Sitaram Vs. State of Haryana (2015) 3 SCC 597, in case of Sharma Agro Industries Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (2014) 12 SCC 681, in case of Magnum Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. UOI (2015) 3 SCC 327, and in case of Radiance Fincab (P) Ltd. Vs. UOI (2015) 1 SCC 677, the Supreme Court following the ratio of the decisions laid down in Pune Municipal Corporation (supra) and Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association (supra) held interalia that the proceedings had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 162 - N K Sud - Full Document

M/S Radiance Fincap(P) Ltd. vs Union Of India . on 12 January, 2015

Similarly in case of Bharat Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (supra), in case of Bimla Devi & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (2014) SCC 583, in case of Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Vs. Jagjit Singh & Ors. (2015) 3 SCC 208, in case of Sitaram Vs. State of Haryana (2015) 3 SCC 597, in case of Sharma Agro Industries Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (2014) 12 SCC 681, in case of Magnum Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. UOI (2015) 3 SCC 327, and in case of Radiance Fincab (P) Ltd. Vs. UOI (2015) 1 SCC 677, the Supreme Court following the ratio of the decisions laid down in Pune Municipal Corporation (supra) and Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association (supra) held interalia that the proceedings had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 9 - Cited by 110 - Full Document

Patel Chunibhai Dajibhai Etc vs Narayanrao Khanderao Jambekar ... on 3 December, 1964

With regard to the two conditions contained in Section 24(2), Mr. Rajendra Prasad has sought to rely upon the decisions of the Supreme Court in case of Patel Chunibhai Dajibha Vs. Narayanrao Khanderao Jumbekar & Anr. AIR 1965 SC 1457 and in case of The Punjab Produce and Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal AIR 1971 SC 2471 to submit that if two negative conditions which are found to be unfulfilled, the condition laid down in the entire clause cannot be said to have been satisfied, and therefore in the instant case the word or in conjunction with the succeeding negatives is required to be read as nor.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 194 - A K Sarkar - Full Document
1