Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.40 seconds)
Rakesh Kumar Khandelwal. vs Union Of India & Ors. on 14 February, 2011 cites

Mardia Chemicals Ltd. Etc. Etc vs U.O.I. & Ors. Etc. Etc on 8 April, 2004

In spite of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Mardia Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Union of India, (2004) 4 SCC 311 upholding the constitutional validity of Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002, the petitioner Rakesh Kumar Khandelwal has filed the present writ petition praying for following relief:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 74 - Cited by 1540 - B Kumar - Full Document

M/S. Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd vs Union Of India And Anr on 28 April, 2004

3. We do not think, this Court has territorial jurisdiction entertain the present writ petition even if the petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of Securitization of Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 and Rule 2(a) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. As noticed above, the entire "cause of action" as alleged in the petition arises out of notice dated 8th November, 2010 written by respondent No. 4 Bank from Jaipur to the petitioner at Jaipur. Notice also states that the property in question is located at Sanganer, Jaipur. These are undisputed facts. The question of territorial jurisdiction is clearly covered by the judgment held by Supreme WPC 711/2011 Page 4 of 7 Court in Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India (2004) 6 SCC 254 . The relevant portions of the said judgment read:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 856 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1