Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.18 seconds)
Smt. Kavita vs State Of U.P. And Another on 1 November, 2022 cites

Santosh Kumar Dash vs The State Of Orissa And Anr. [Alongwith ... on 24 March, 1992

5. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that though the applicant and co-accused persons have been summoned under section 302/120-B IPC but the attending facts and circumstances of the case clearly show that it was a case of suicide and that no offence under Section 302 IPC is made out. Learned counsel has referred the case of Santoshi @ Santosh Kumar vs. State of U.P. (Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/s 438 CrPC No-5775 of 2020), decided on 18.11.2020, wherein, co-ordinate Bench of this Court has granted anticipatory bail to the accused for offences under Sections 302, 328, 420 IPC.
Orissa High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 26 - B L Hansaria - Full Document

Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 2 December, 2010

14. It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.
Supreme Court of India Cites 65 - Cited by 21316 - D Bhandari - Full Document
1