Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (1.58 seconds)

M/S Topman Exports vs Commr Of Income Tax,Mumbai on 8 February, 2012

6. We have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the relevant material available on record. As regards the issue involved in ground No. 1(a) of the assessee's appeal, it is observed that as per the 5th proviso to section 80HHC(3) of the Act, in case the computation under Clause (a) or (b) or (c) of sub section 3 of section 80HHC of the Act is a loss, such loss is to be set off against the amount which bears to 90% of any sum referred to in clause (iiia) or clause (3) or clause (iiic) of section 28 of the Act as the case may be. As held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Topman Exports vs. CIT, 342 ITR 249 (SC), the face value of DEPB falls u/s 28(iiib) while the duty drawback falls u/s 28(iiic) of the Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 417 - A K Patnaik - Full Document
1