State Of Uttaranchal & Anr vs Sunil Kumar Singh Negi on 12 March, 2008
2. In fact, if the direction issued by the co-ordinate Bench
of this Court on 20.07.2015 is taken into consideration, while
declining the interference in C482 application, the Court has
reserved the right of the petitioner herein that he may bring the facts
of forgery and fabrication alleged by him against respondent before
the court below, who is ceased with the trial of the case. As far as
this aspect is concerned, it is not in dispute that he has already raised
the plea of forgery and fabrication against the respondent before the
court below. The subsequent direction is complained to be flouted by
the court below who is ceased with the trial. It is to the effect that if
the petitioner places the aspects of forgery and fabrication before the
2
Court below, it was directed that the court, ceased with the trial, will
consider these aspects, and pass a speaking order therein. This
opportunity of the present contempt petitioner given therein by the
order dated 20th July 2017 was limited to be provided to him at an
appropriate stage of the proceedings in accordance with the
procedure laid down in the Code of Criminal Procedure.