State Of U.P.& Ors vs Arvind Kumar Srivastava & Ors on 17 October, 2014
The petitioners thereafter approached this Court and the first
petition, in the present bunch of cases was filed on 06.02.2016 and the last
on 16.02.2016 after the above said observations. The case of the petitioners
herein also is that they are falling short of 1.5 to 2 marks and if benefit of
that one question is given, the petitioners would score 2.5 marks and sail
through to qualify for the cut off of the main examination. It has been
accordingly argued that the principle of equality as such would be violated
SHIVANI GUPTA
2016.02.29 16:06
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
Chandigarh
CWP No. 2634 of 2016 5
and since the Board has not appealed against the said judgment, the
petitioners are entitled for the benefit of the same. The judgments relied
upon by this Court are being sought to be distinguished on various grounds
including that only a period of one month had elapsed since the filing of the
writ petition and the declaration of the result.