Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.32 seconds)

N. Krishan (Decd. By Legal ... vs Settlement Commission And Ors. on 10 March, 1989

12.2. The learned senior counsel for the appellant placed reliance on the decision of the Karnataka High Court in N.Krishnan (died) v. Settlement Commission and others [1989 180 ITR 585] wherein it was held that “if there is grave procedural defects such as violation of mandatory procedural requirements and there is no nexus between the reasons given and the decision taken by the Settlement Commission, then the High Court, in exercise of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 10/54 WA No. 1852 of 2021 power under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, can interfere with the proceedings of the Commission”. By pointing out the said decision, the learned senior counsel submitted that the decision making process itself is arbitrary inasmuch as the mandatory procedural requirements have not been followed and the earnest efforts taken by the appellant to settle the tax dues has not been appreciated by the second respondent Commission.
Karnataka High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 27 - Full Document
1