Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.67 seconds)
R.Sampath vs State Represented By on 10 March, 2022 cites

Teesta Atul Setalvad vs The State Of Gujarat on 15 December, 2017

16. Dealing with the question centers around sweep, purport and applicability of Section 102(1) of Cr.P.C, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Teesta Atul Setalvad ..vs.. State of Gujarat reported in (2018) 2 SCC 372 observed quoting from the judgment reported in (1997) 7 SCC 685 (State of Maharashtra ..vs.. Tapas D.Neogy) that, 'We are therefore persuaded to take the view that the bank account of the accused or any of his relations, is property, within the meaning of Section 102 of Cr.P.C and a police officer in the course of investigation can seize or prohibit the operation of the said account, if such assets have direct links with the commission of offence for which the police officer is investigating into.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 92 - A M Khanwilkar - Full Document

Ratan Babulal Lath vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2021

19. Finally, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rattan Babulal ..vs.. State of Karnataka reported in 2021 SCC OnLine 875 for the proposition that when Section 18A of Prevention of Corruption Act gives power of attachment and forfeiture of property, the attachment of bank account and freezing of account under Section 102 Cr.P.C is unsustainable. Learned counsel for the petitioner heavily relied on this judgment in support of his submission that the seizure of account and locker and its freezing under Section 102 Cr.P.C., is not sustainable and against the law. The reading of this judgment shows 19/25 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.795 of 2021 that, it was submitted by the respondent therein that they are in the process of filing an application under Section 18A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Taking that into account, it was held that it was not possible to sustain the freezing of bank account under Section 102 Cr.P.C., as the Prevention of Corruption Act is a Code by itself.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

Nevada Properties Pvt. Ltd. Through Its ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 24 September, 2019

In support of his submission, learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the judgment reported in (1987) SCC Online Del 221 (Ms.Swaran Sabharwal ..vs.. Commissioner of Police), (1997) 7 SCC 685 (State of Maharashtra ..vs.. Tapas D.Neogy), (2018) 2 SCC 372 (Teesta Atul Setalvad ..vs.. State of Gujarat), 2019 SCC OnLine SC 1247 (Nevada Properties Private Limited ..vs.. State of Maharashtra) and 2021 SCC OnLine SC 875 (Ratan Babulal ..vs.. State of Karnataka).
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 51 - S Khanna - Full Document
1