Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.42 seconds)
Anil Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 8 December, 2017 cites

Sanjay Chandra vs Cbi on 23 November, 2011

8. By now it is well settled that gravity alone cannot be decisive ground to deny bail, rather competing factors are required to be balanced by the court while exercising its discretion. It has been repeatedly held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that object of bail is to secure the appearance of the accused person at his trial by reasonable amount of bail. The object of bail is neither punitive nor preventative. The Hon'ble Apex Court in Sanjay Chandra versus Central Bureau of Investigation (2012)1 Supreme Court Cases 49; has been held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 20107 - H L Dattu - Full Document

Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 2 December, 2010

9. Law with regard to grant of bail is now well settled. The Apex Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre versus State of Maharashtra and others, (2011) 1 SCC 694, while relying upon its decision rendered by its Constitution Bench in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia vs. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 565, laid down the following parameters for grant of bail:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 65 - Cited by 21316 - D Bhandari - Full Document

Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Etc vs State Of Punjab on 9 April, 1980

"111. No inflexible guidelines or straitjacket formula can be provided for grant or refusal of anticipatory bail. We are clearly of the view that no attempt should be made to provide rigid and inflexible guidelines in this respect because all circumstances and situations of future cannot be clearly visualized for the grant or refusal of anticipatory bail. In consonance with the legislative intention the grant or refusal of anticipatory ::: Downloaded on - 08/12/2017 23:09:46 :::HCHP 6 bail should necessarily depend on facts and circumstances of each case. As aptly observed in the Constitution Bench decision in Sibbia's case (supra) that the High Court or the Court of Sessions to exercise their jurisdiction under section 438 Cr.P.C. by a wise .
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 8067 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document
1