Sunjay Datt vs State (Ii) on 9 September, 1994
In so
many words, in para 53(2)(a) of the judgment, this Court
in Sanjay Dutt [Sanjay Dutt v. State, (1994) 5 SCC 410 :
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.24 seconds)Hitendra Vishnu Thakur And Others Etc. ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Others on 12 July, 1994
44. As noted earlier, the only modification made
by the larger Bench in Sanjay Dutt [Sanjay
Dutt v. State, (1994) 5 SCC 410 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1433]
to the decision in Hitendra Vishnu Thakur [Hitendra
Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra, (1994) 4 SCC
602 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1087] is about the mode of
service of notice of the application for extension.
Jigar @ Jimmy Pravinchandra Adatiya vs State Of Gujarat on 23 September, 2022
(Emphasis supplied)
16
Interpretation of Section 167 of the Cr.P.C. and knowledge to the
accused need not detain this Court for long or delve deep into the
matter. The judgment of the Apex Court in the case of JIGAR
ALIAS JIMMY PRAVINCHANDRA ADATIYA v. STATE OF
GUJARAT1 is a comprehensive answer to the contentions of both
the petitioners and the respondent. The Apex Court, in the
aforesaid judgment, holds as follows:
Devinderpal Singh vs Govt. Of National Capital Territory Of ... on 14 November, 1995
In Devinderpal Singh v. State (NCT of
Delhi) [Devinderpal Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi), (1996) 1
SCC 44 : 1996 SCC (Cri) 5] , this Court in paras 14 and 15
held thus : (SCC p. 48)
"14.
Ateef Nasir Mulla vs State Of Maharashtra on 24 August, 2005
In Ateef Nasir Mulla [Ateef Nasir Mulla v. State of
Maharashtra, (2005) 7 SCC 29 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 1587] , this
Court considered a similar provision under POTA.
Sanjay Kumar Kedia vs Narcotics Control Bureau & Anr on 3 December, 2007
In Sanjay Kumar Kedia [Sanjay Kumar
Kedia v. Narcotics Control Bureau, (2009) 17 SCC 631 :
1