Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.23 seconds)Section 13 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 180 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
K. Bhaskaran vs Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan And Anr on 29 September, 1999
In K. Bhaskaran vs. Sankaran
Vaidhyan Balan and anr., {1999 (7) SCC 510} (cited by the
learned senior counsel) the question considered was whether
a particular court has jurisdiction to try the offence
under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. That
decision also is not of any help in reaching an answer to
the crucial question involved in these appeals.
Purushottamdas Dalmia vs The State Of West Bengal on 19 April, 1961
Shri P.S. Mishra, learned senior counsel cited the
decisions in Purushottamdas Dalmia vs. The State of West
Bengal {1962 (2) SCR 101} and L.N. Mukherjee vs. The State
of Madras {1962 (2) SCR 116}. In the former it was held
that the court which has jurisdiction to try the offence of
conspiracy could also deal with the overt acts done
pursuant to the conspiracy. The latter decision is
concerned with the converse position. In the light of the
discussions made above it is immaterial whether such other
court would also have jurisdiction in the circumstances of
those cases.
L. N. Mukherjee vs The State Of Madras on 19 April, 1961
Shri P.S. Mishra, learned senior counsel invited our
attention to the decision of this Court in Banwari lal
Jhunjhunwala and ors. vs. Union of India and anr. {1963
Supple.(2) SCR 338}. We may point out that this is the
same case in which the Kerala High Court had decided the
question of jurisdiction in the decisions cited supra.
When an offshoot of the said case reached this Court the
question focussed here was whether different bills created
for the purpose of cheating would have been treated as
relating to distinct offences warranting separate charges
to be framed. We do not find any aid from the said
decision for the question involved in the present cases.