Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.41 seconds)
Ashok Kumar Thru (Brother) Rakesh Kumar ... vs Union Of India Thru Ministry Of Home New ... on 15 October, 2014 cites

समक 1989 Cri.L.J. 2061 (Naib Singh vs . State Of Punjab), on 16 April, 2014

(vii) This Court is also persuaded in concluding as above by judgments rendered by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in 1996 Cr.L.J. 3329, Amrik Singh v. State of Punjab; 1998 Cr.L.J. 1460 titled 'Rajeev Kumar v. State of Punjab'; 1997 Cr.L.J. 3104 titled 'Deep Kumar v. State of Punjab' and judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Md. Sahab Uddin and another v. State of Assam, decided on 5.10.2012 in Criminal Appeal No.1602 of 2012, S.L.P.(Crl.)
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 36 - Full Document

Rajeev Kumar Beri vs State Of Punjab on 17 April, 2014

23. Learned counsel has argued that Gauhati High Court in Md.Sahab Uddin and Another v. State of Assam (Bail Application No.885 and 886 of 2012 decided on 25.5.2012) while considering the issue of grant of bail has considered the judgments rendered by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Deep Kumar's case (supra) and Rajeev Kumar's case (supra). The cases have not been distinguished. Bail application of Sahab Uddin was dismissed while considering that the petitioners were found carrying seized drugs in a clandestine manner, concealed among household articles, through National Highway Crossing without valid permit or authorization. It was not shown that the drugs were for medical use.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Deep Kumar And Ors. vs State Of Punjab on 10 March, 1997

23. Learned counsel has argued that Gauhati High Court in Md.Sahab Uddin and Another v. State of Assam (Bail Application No.885 and 886 of 2012 decided on 25.5.2012) while considering the issue of grant of bail has considered the judgments rendered by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Deep Kumar's case (supra) and Rajeev Kumar's case (supra). The cases have not been distinguished. Bail application of Sahab Uddin was dismissed while considering that the petitioners were found carrying seized drugs in a clandestine manner, concealed among household articles, through National Highway Crossing without valid permit or authorization. It was not shown that the drugs were for medical use.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 19 - P K Jain - Full Document

Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 7 April, 2005

93. Although the above noted two judgments rendered in Md.Sahab Uddin's case (supra) and Rajesh Kumar Gupta's case (supra) rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India are in bail jurisdiction and, therefore, cannot strictly be said to be laying down the law on the issue involved in this case [vide Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma' case (supra)(Para-46)]. However, this Court can take a cue from the observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 340 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Thr.His Next Friend ... vs Union Of India Throu.Ministry Of Home ... on 1 July, 2014

96. The contention of learned counsel for respondents that judgment dated 1.7.2014 in writ petition nos. 455 (H/C) of 2013 (Ashok Kumar and another v. Union of India and others) is binding law, wherein the petitioner sought issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus is concerned, this Court is of the considered opinion that the judgment cannot be considered as law declaring that Phensedyl Cough Syrup recovered from the premises of co-accused would be sufficient to invoke penal provisions of N.D.P.S.Act against the petitioner.
Allahabad High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 4 - U N Singh - Full Document

Sahab Uddin Khan vs The State Of Assam on 14 August, 2013

(vii) This Court is also persuaded in concluding as above by judgments rendered by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in 1996 Cr.L.J. 3329, Amrik Singh v. State of Punjab; 1998 Cr.L.J. 1460 titled 'Rajeev Kumar v. State of Punjab'; 1997 Cr.L.J. 3104 titled 'Deep Kumar v. State of Punjab' and judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Md. Sahab Uddin and another v. State of Assam, decided on 5.10.2012 in Criminal Appeal No.1602 of 2012, S.L.P.(Crl.)
Gauhati High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - P K Saikia - Full Document
1