Chimanlal Ganpat vs Rajaram Maganchand Oswal on 2 November, 1936
In Chimanlal Ganpat v. Rajaram
Maganchand Oswal, AIR 1937; Bom 158, it was
held that under the aforesaid Act, in order to
give the Court jurisdiction the minor must be
'ordinarily resident' within the local limits of the
jurisdiction of the Court The same view was
expressed in Sarada Nayar v. Vayankara Amma,
AIR 1957 Ker 158. However, the Court further
held that such a place of residence has to be
determined by finding out as to where the
minor was ordinarily residing and where such
residence would have continued but for the
recent removal of the minor to a different
Tr.P.(C).No. 23 of 2023 Page 13
Page 14 of 18
place.