Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.30 seconds)
Jindal Steel Limited vs Registrar Of Trade Marks on 17 February, 2026 cites

I Am The Ocean, Llc vs Registrar Of Trade Marks, Trademark ... on 14 June, 2023

18. The impugned order dated 25.07.2025 suffers from lack of reasoning as also suffers from non-application of mind to the detailed submissions made by the Appellant, as captured above. The Bombay High Court in I Am The Ocean, LLC v. Registrar of Trade Marks, MANU/MH/2701/2023 remanded the matter back to the Registrar of the Trade Marks on the ground that the impugned order was passed without considering the submissions made by the petitioner therein. It was observed that the impugned order lacked cogent reasons. Bombay High Court highlighted that in several matters in the past, submissions and documents which formed part of the This is a digitally signed order.
Bombay High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R I Chagla - Full Document

Alkem Laboratories Limited vs Mega International(P) Ltd. on 14 November, 2014

In furtherance of this argument, it is fairly urged that albeit Appellant did not directly urge honest and concurrent use under Section 12 of 1999 Act before the Respondent, however, it had specifically pleaded prior use of the trademark, which was sufficient for the Respondent to exercise discretion under Section 12 and grant registration on ground of honest and concurrent use and in support of this plea, reliance is placed on the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Alkem Laboratories Ltd. v. Mega International (P) Ltd., 2009 SCC OnLine Del 2878. To sum up, Mr. Hemant Singh argues that Respondent did not consider the crucial issues flagged by the Appellant in the comprehensive reply to the ER as also the additional submissions and has ignored the relevant material on record and hence, the matter deserves to be remanded to the Respondent for re- consideration of the trademark application.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - H L Dattu - Full Document
1