Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.19 seconds)
Dev Pal & Bittu vs Of on 13 October, 2023 cites

Tofan Singh vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 29 October, 2020

9. Leaving everything aside, there is no dispute that bail petitioners have been booked under Section 29 of the Act on the basis of the statement made by co- accused, which is not rt admissible as has been held by Hon'ble Apex Court in Tofan Singh case (supra). In the aforesaid judgment, Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that disclosure statement, if any, made under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, is inadmissible and same cannot be used as a confessional statement in the trial of an offence under Section 67 of the Act. Relevant para of the aforesaid judgment reads as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 360 - Cited by 1439 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Dataram Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 6 February, 2018

22. Hon'ble Apex Court in Criminal Appeal No. 227/2018, Dataram Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr decided on 6.2.2018 has held that freedom of an individual cannot be curtailed ::: Downloaded on - 17/10/2023 20:42:42 :::CIS 15 for indefinite period, especially when his/her guilt is yet to be proved. It has been further held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the .
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 35378 - M B Lokur - Full Document

Sanjay Chandra vs Cbi on 23 November, 2011

23. Hon'ble Apex Court in Sanjay Chandra versus Central Bureau of Investigation (2012)1 Supreme Court Cases of 49 has held that gravity alone cannot be a decisive ground to deny bail, rather competing factors are required to be balanced by the court while exercising its discretion. It has been repeatedly held by rt the Hon'ble Apex Court that object of bail is to secure the appearance of the accused person at his trial by reasonable amount of bail. The object of bail is neither punitive nor preventative.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 20107 - H L Dattu - Full Document
1